Sony FDR-AX33 vs Sony HDR-PJ650V: The Battle for the Best Camcorder

What To Know

  • The FDR-AX33 features a built-in battery that provides up to 135 minutes of recording time, while the HDR-PJ650V boasts a slightly longer battery life of up to 150 minutes.
  • If you’re looking for a more budget-friendly option with a convenient built-in projector, the Sony HDR-PJ650V is a solid choice.
  • Its Full HD video recording capabilities and compact design make it a great option for casual videographers and those who want to share their videos on the go.

Choosing the right camcorder can be a daunting task, especially when faced with a plethora of options. If you’re considering Sony’s offerings, the FDR-AX33 and HDR-PJ650V are two popular contenders. While both boast impressive features, they cater to different needs and preferences. This comprehensive comparison will delve into the strengths and weaknesses of each model, helping you determine which one is the perfect match for your filming aspirations.

A Glimpse into the Contenders:

The Sony FDR-AX33 and HDR-PJ650V are both compact, versatile camcorders designed for capturing high-quality videos. The FDR-AX33 is a more recent model, featuring advanced technology and a sleek design. The HDR-PJ650V, on the other hand, is a slightly older model with a more budget-friendly price tag.

Image Quality Showdown:

The heart of any camcorder lies in its image quality. Both the FDR-AX33 and HDR-PJ650V excel in this department, but with subtle differences. The FDR-AX33 boasts a 26.8mm wide-angle ZEISS lens, offering a wider field of view for capturing expansive landscapes and group shots. It also utilizes a 29.8mm 1/2.8-type Exmor R CMOS sensor, delivering impressive low-light performance and detailed images.
The HDR-PJ650V, while equipped with a slightly smaller 1/3-type CMOS sensor, still captures crisp and vibrant videos. Its 26.8mm wide-angle Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar lens provides a good balance between wide-angle shots and telephoto reach.

Video Recording Capabilities:

Both camcorders offer a range of recording options, but the FDR-AX33 takes the lead with its advanced features. It supports 4K video recording at 30p, capturing stunning detail and clarity. Additionally, it offers XAVC S recording, a high-quality codec that preserves the richness of your footage. The HDR-PJ650V, while capable of recording in Full HD 1080p, lacks the 4K resolution offered by the FDR-AX33.

Audio Performance:

Audio quality is crucial for capturing immersive videos. The FDR-AX33 comes equipped with a built-in stereo microphone, providing clear and balanced audio. It also features a microphone jack, allowing you to connect external microphones for professional-level sound recording. The HDR-PJ650V also offers a built-in stereo microphone, but it lacks the external microphone jack found on the FDR-AX33.

Features and Functionality:

Both camcorders offer a variety of features designed to enhance your filming experience. The FDR-AX33 stands out with its advanced image stabilization system, which effectively minimizes camera shake, resulting in smoother videos. It also includes a built-in GPS receiver for geotagging your footage and a slow-motion recording mode for capturing dramatic moments.
The HDR-PJ650V, while lacking some of the advanced features of the FDR-AX33, still offers a solid set of functionalities. It features a built-in projector, allowing you to share your videos directly on a screen. It also includes a built-in HDMI output for connecting to external displays and a USB port for data transfer.

Design and Ergonomics:

The FDR-AX33 boasts a sleek and compact design, making it easy to carry and maneuver. It features a large, high-resolution LCD screen for framing your shots and a comfortable grip for steady recording. The HDR-PJ650V also offers a compact design, but its body feels slightly bulkier compared to the FDR-AX33.

Battery Life and Connectivity:

Both camcorders offer decent battery life, allowing you to record for an extended period. The FDR-AX33 features a built-in battery that provides up to 135 minutes of recording time, while the HDR-PJ650V boasts a slightly longer battery life of up to 150 minutes.
Both camcorders offer a range of connectivity options, including HDMI, USB, and headphone jacks. The FDR-AX33 also features Wi-Fi and NFC connectivity, allowing you to easily transfer your footage to your smartphone or tablet.

The Verdict: Choosing the Right Camcorder

Ultimately, the best camcorder for you depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize 4K video recording, advanced features, and a sleek design, the Sony FDR-AX33 is the clear winner. Its impressive image quality, extensive recording options, and user-friendly interface make it an excellent choice for both amateur and professional videographers.
If you’re looking for a more budget-friendly option with a convenient built-in projector, the Sony HDR-PJ650V is a solid choice. Its Full HD video recording capabilities and compact design make it a great option for casual videographers and those who want to share their videos on the go.

What You Need to Learn

Q: What are the key differences between the Sony FDR-AX33 and Sony HDR-PJ650V?
A: The FDR-AX33 offers 4K video recording, a wider lens, advanced image stabilization, and a more sleek design. The HDR-PJ650V is more affordable, features a built-in projector, and has slightly longer battery life.
Q: Which camcorder is better for low-light filming?
A: The FDR-AX33 excels in low-light conditions thanks to its larger sensor and advanced image processing.
Q: Can I use an external microphone with the HDR-PJ650V?
A: No, the HDR-PJ650V does not have an external microphone jack.
Q: Which camcorder is more suitable for travel vlogging?
A: Both camcorders are suitable for travel vlogging, but the FDR-AX33’s 4K video recording and advanced image stabilization make it a better choice for capturing high-quality footage on the go.
Q: Is the built-in projector on the HDR-PJ650V useful?
A: The built-in projector on the HDR-PJ650V is a convenient feature for sharing your videos with a small group of people. However, its brightness and resolution are limited, making it less suitable for large presentations.